Talk:A Troll in Central Park
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Trollcentralpark.jpg[edit]
Image:Trollcentralpark.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protect this page?[edit]
Will anyone take this challenge? It keeps getting vandalized by a Wikipedia sockpuppet who changes his/her IP address every few days to avoid getting blocked. This is one of the pages he/she targets.
I would do it, if only I were an administrator.--Freshh (talk) 19:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Plot to take over New York City?[edit]
Really? Shouldn't someone change this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.66.123 (talk) 00:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Citations? Anyone?[edit]
I'm not seeing any. I understand the page has a history of being vandalised, but if the solution was to revert to an earler version, I'm left thinking they were never there. Shn525 (talk) 07:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Off-topic chat
|
---|
Warner Archive Why A Troll in Central Park was not part of the Warner Archive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.222.93.115 (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
|
Warner Bros. reacquisition[edit]
You do not want Warner Bros. reacquire "A Troll in Central Park"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.185.83.155 (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Shout! Factory[edit]
The rights licensed by 20th Century Studios (20th Century Fox) will be expired in 2022. "A Troll in Central Park" will be part of Shout! Factory Kids library with the other films licensed by Shout! Factory. 189.40.105.43 (talk) 04:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- We can't do anything with this claim without a reliable source for it. Do you have one? General Ization Talk 04:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- Start-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- Start-Class Animated films articles
- Low-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American animation articles
- Mid-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- C-Class Animated films articles
- Mid-importance Animated films articles
- C-Class Warner Bros. Animation articles
- Mid-importance Warner Bros. Animation articles
- Warner Bros. Animation work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class 2010s articles
- Low-importance 2010s articles
- WikiProject 2010s articles