Template:Did you know nominations/Data breach
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 06:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Data breach
- ... that data breaches are rarely detected by the compromised organization? Source: Crawley 2021, p. 39, Fowler 2016, p. 64, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016, p. 25
- ALT1: ... that besides direct costs and temporary stock price drops, there is little evidence of economic harm to organizations that suffer a data breach? Source: https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fcybsec%2Ftyab021
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hermann Alfred Tanner
Improved to Good Article status by Buidhe paid (talk) and Chipmunkdavis (talk).
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
(t · c) buidhe 16:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC).
article is long enough, recently promoted to GA and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting to a broad audience. QPQ is done. I prefer ALT0. Earwig was 22% but no real issues. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
