Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)
Short description: English television personality
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
A fact from Megan Barton-Hanson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT5: ... that over the course of its broadcast, the British game show Hey Tracey! gave away a night in a haunted pub, snail and garlic flavour crisps, three "massive" bags of gravel, and vegan condoms? Source: multiple
Comment: It would be great if this could run on 6 March, her 30th birthday. If either ALT1 or ALT2 run, I could probably throw together an article on either the Cock Destroyers or Hey Tracey and run this as a double nom. Update 20 January: The Cock Destroyers was deleted at RfD (it should never have been redirected to Rebecca More), and with hindsight it may be too explicit for the front page anyway. I will leave it for a reviewer to strike it. Update 24 January: Article on Hey Tracey added to nom.
Overall: This section of the review is only relevant to hooks ALT, ALT1, ALT2 and ALT3. Article is new enough, long enough, very well and clearly sourced, article is plagiariss free. Hooks are cited and intersting, but I am striking ALT2 we're talking about a BLP. I'm on the fence about ALT3 - but as the nominator says the fact that cock destroyer got deleted makes it weaker. I've added one request for clarification to the article - if that could be addressed I can OK it. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: This section of the review is only relevant to hooks ALT, ALT4 and ALT5. There's a couple of places where I've asked for clarification as it's not clear to me how the information fits in with the topic, it would be great if they could be addressed to help the reader. Otherwise article is new enough, long enough, well sourced, neutral, plagiarism free, QPQ is done. Hooks are cited and interesting. Although I do not like ALT4personally. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall comments
ALT (double nomination), ALT1 and ALT5 appear to me to be the strongest hooks. I think some behind-the-scenes technical detail might be needed to link Hey Tracey to this nomination (that is beyond me though). If the clarifications are addressed, both can be OK'd. Thanks for creating the articles @Launchballer:Lajmmoore (talk) 09:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Personal is an online store, which I've added. I've also expanded the lede of Hey Tracey - the relevance is that Abadi and Pollard are format developers, and that the show quite literally involves people irritating people with humorous phone calls, but perhaps it would be better that readers had that information to begin with.--Launchballer 10:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Y Thanks very much Launchballer those changes do make it much clearer Lajmmoore (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did put in a request that Megan's article run on 6 March, is this possible?--Launchballer 13:13, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]